Article 2 – Language Arts
Chapter 1 – The Unforgivable Word
There is a word that no one must speak or even dare to speak. I, too, will never utter it here. Anyone who says the unforgivable word commits blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
The most high forgives all sins except blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. The unforgivable word is the word, the queen mother of dirty words, whose meaning is known to the Beast, and whose number is 666.
The unforgivable word is the F-word or the “F-(Dash)–(Dash)–(Dash)”. He who speaks the F-word is guilty of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
The definition of the F-word is more sinister than one would realize. When spoken, the F-word means to spill the divine energy by having an orgasm.
He who recommends having an orgasm is a sorcerer.
Another word that defines the spilling of divine energy by having the orgasm is fornication, which is the act of engaging in sexual intercourse outside the bounds of a sacred union, thereby desecrating the holiness of sex and committing blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
There are many ways to blaspheme against the Holy Spirit: by mouth or through one's actions, primarily through fornication.
The second Decalogue clearly states that no one has the right to take the name of the Innermost in vain. Religion is sacred, sex is holy; therefore, religion is 100% sexual. Fornication is never religious, even a pervert would claim it to be. If the pervert says fornication is religious, tell him that he lies. Hence, it's crucial to be mindful when discussing religion with others to avoid committing blasphemy. Desecrating the holiness of religion and sex is a grave offense.
A pervert would worthlessly combine The F-word with any title of the Innermost by swearing. It is blasphemy. If the pervert shows no remorse for simply speaking the f-word, he is dead, eternally guilty. The consequences of sexual blasphemy are severe and eternal, instilling a sense of fear and caution in the audience.
He who uses the F-word in combination with the mother commits blasphemy against both the mother and the Holy Spirit. The mother is our Divine Mother Kundalini, the White Queen. This crime is how one insults our holy mother of chastity.
He who uses the name of Jesus Christ with the F-word blasphemes both against Christ and the Holy Spirit, exactly how one takes the name of Jesus Christ in vain. Christ is the Chief of the White Lodge. Christ is our Yah-Hovah, the White King, the King of Kings.
Remember: sex contradicts no religion. Sex is holy when a man and woman perform the coitus reservatus. In this sacred sexual practice, the couple engages in sexual activity without ejaculation, thereby conserving and transmuting the divine energy, which is sacred to the Holy Spirit.
He who shamelessly speaks or writes the F-word commits blasphemy against sex. Whosoever does so is among the dead. The dead carry 100% of the Ego.
The Ego, who is Satan, survives physical death but will never survive the second death.
Unless one destroys the Ego, the residence of the dead will be their damnation until death, where one will face punishment in Hell until the second death is complete. The second death is the complete annihilation of the Ego, a fate that awaits those who persist in impure behavior.
Therefore, it is of utmost importance that no one write or speak the F-word lest they damns themselves to death. No one can overstate the urgency of this message.
Chapter 2 – The Independent Clause
An independent clause is a clause or sentence phrase that stands alone. We use it in sentence diagrams. Its antithesis is a dependent clause. An example of an independent clause is, “A cat eats a rat.”
A dependent clause is a clause or a sentence phrase that never stands alone. In sentence diagrams, we grammatically call a dependent clause a fragment. An example of a dependent clause is “Because the rats are pests”. The sentence structure sounds like a fragment (even if you were typing on a word-processor application on a computer, it would show a green or blue underline, which requires a grammar check).
Independent and dependent clauses, beyond their grammatical function, symbolize living beings and objects in pairs. A pair, in this context, is two dependent clauses merged into an independent clause. This symbolic representation extends to shoes, socks, animals, and living beings, all of which are pairs.
1 Corinthians 11:11 states that: “in the innermost, however, a woman is not independent of a man, nor is a man independent of a woman”. I state: “By divine will, a man is dependent on a woman, and a woman is dependent on a man.” Thereby, a man and a woman are a pair of beings.
A male and a female are also a pair, each needing the other in a mutual and respectful relationship. A male needs a female, and a female needs a male. Elohim made a man and a woman for each other. Every man has a female aspect; likewise, every woman has a male aspect, emphasizing the mutual respect and understanding in their relationship.
Lo and behold: A man is never a man without a woman. Likewise, a woman is never a woman without a man.
A man, or male, is a dependent clause. Similarly, a woman, or female, is also a dependent clause. However, when these two dependent clauses unite as male (man) and female (woman), they create an independent clause. This independent clause symbolizes the will to return to the kingdom of his innermost, a metaphorical interpretation of unity and gender.
(UNDER CONSTRUCTION)